0:35 I would like to conclude by saying that ah, what I have done here I think is just my duty. I am not here to take any sides, in fact I know that you had approached me several months ago with this case and I thought like maybe convinced when I say something I believe in what I say, and that is why I would like to emphasize what I have said here is after convincing myself
1:00 that this is how it is. In other words I am not convinced that it is a case of poisoning, or it is malicious poisoning. I am not convinced at all. So that is how I would like to conclude. I would like a little bit more if at all somebody has got still those things burning inside that there is something malicious there let him do it in a proper way. and that I have explained. We are all here to look at the truth, nobody is here I think to
2:30 conceal something or obfuscate something, I don’t think so. We are all aching to know is there anything here, and as it stands now, from the toxicology point of view I don’t think there is anything here except for a lot of things being thrown into the air the, you know… it’s all just there, we don’t know as to what to make out of it, any kind of meaning of it out there… I think we need to be honest, The final thing I would like to say is
2:00 whenever there is a doubt, this is my medical professor would say between something that is usual and something that is unusual, go for the usual because as they say in medicine, when you think of the common thing, you are commonly right, when you are thinking of something rare, you are rarely right, so here I think the logical thing is he passed away a natural death, that is how you should look at it. If you are going to look at that in a kind of suspicion,
2:30 then there should be really substantial, credible things to strengthen those suspicions, you just can’t go on making all kinds of allegations lightly. That is not science.
Audio: DrPillay_9788 – Length 2:47 – https://youtu.be/BrOmdXFxw9s