Truth Labs could easily understand that Naveen Krishna/Khurana was a Cash Cow that they could easily milk simply by providing the documents he was obviously willing to pay nicely for when endorsed with their logo. This will naturally raise questions about just how truthful to so-called Truth Labs really are. Some might be quick to point out that in India, if you have adequate funds, you can purchase whatever you want. I prefer to give Truth Labs the benefit of the doubt. After all they are supposed to be legal experts
If we careful read the document Naveen Krishna/Khurana paid heavily for we find that right in the opening statement Truth Labs declared they were only given “certain documents to comment on for “Forensic Evaluation.” They clarified that their “inferences” are based on the document issued by Dr. Morris and they are very careful to disclaim many of their statements with leading words like “..it appears…” This is not evidence. It is a document crafted to “appear” like legal evidence although it adds nothing new in establishing that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned and raises all sorts of ethical questions about Truth Labs. Are they committed to reporting the “Truth”, or milking cash cows when they have the opportunity to?
